Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, Vol 7 (2005)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large
DMTCS vol 7 no 1 (2005), pp. 37-50

Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science

DMTCS

Volume 7 n° 1 (2005), pp. 37-50


author:David R. Wood
title:Acyclic, Star and Oriented Colourings of Graph Subdivisions
keywords:graph, graph colouring, star colouring, star chromatic number, acyclic colouring, acyclic chromatic number, oriented colouring, oriented chromatic number, subdivision
abstract:Let G be a graph with chromatic number χ(G). A vertex colouring of G is acyclic if each bichromatic subgraph is a forest. A star colouring of G is an acyclic colouring in which each bichromatic subgraph is a star forest. Let χa(G) and χs(G) denote the acyclic and star chromatic numbers of G. This paper investigates acyclic and star colourings of subdivisions. Let G' be the graph obtained from G by subdividing each edge once. We prove that acyclic (respectively, star) colourings of G' correspond to vertex partitions of G in which each subgraph has small arboricity (chromatic index). It follows that χa(G'), χs(G') and χ(G) are tied, in the sense that each is bounded by a function of the other. Moreover the binding functions that we establish are all tight. The oriented chromatic number χ(G) of an (undirected) graph G is the maximum, taken over all orientations D of G, of the minimum number of colours in a vertex colouring of D such that between any two colour classes, all edges have the same direction. We prove that χ(G')=χ(G) whenever χ(G)≥9.

If your browser does not display the abstract correctly (because of the different mathematical symbols) you can look it up in the PostScript or PDF files.

reference: David R. Wood (2005), Acyclic, Star and Oriented Colourings of Graph Subdivisions, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 7, pp. 37-50
bibtex:For a corresponding BibTeX entry, please consider our BibTeX-file.
ps.gz-source:dm070104.ps.gz (59 K)
ps-source:dm070104.ps (168 K)
pdf-source:dm070104.pdf (123 K)

The first source gives you the `gzipped' PostScript, the second the plain PostScript and the third the format for the Adobe accrobat reader. Depending on the installation of your web browser, at least one of these should (after some amount of time) pop up a window for you that shows the full article. If this is not the case, you should contact your system administrator to install your browser correctly.

Due to limitations of your local software, the two formats may show up differently on your screen. If eg you use xpdf to visualize pdf, some of the graphics in the file may not come across. On the other hand, pdf has a capacity of giving links to sections, bibliography and external references that will not appear with PostScript.


Automatically produced on Do Apr 21 13:14:39 CEST 2005 by gustedt