2005 European Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Applications (EuroComb '05)
Stefan Felsner (ed.)
DMTCS Conference Volume AE (2005), pp. 129-132
| author: | Veerle Fack, Svetlana Topalova and Joost Winne |
|---|---|
| title: | On the enumeration of uniquely reducible double designs |
| keywords: | double design, projective plane, enumeration |
| abstract: |
A double 2-(
v
,
k
,
2λ
) design is a design which is reducible into two 2-(
v
,
k
,
λ
) designs. It is called uniquely reducible if it has,
up to equivalence, only one reduction. We present
properties of uniquely reducible double designs which show
that their total number can be determined if only the
designs with non-trivial automorphisms are classified with
respect to their automorphism group. As an application,
after proving that a reducible 2-(21,5,2) design is
uniquely reducible, we establish that the number of all
reducible 2-(21,5,2) designs is 1 746 461 307.
|
| If your browser does not display the abstract correctly (because of the different mathematical symbols) you may look it up in the PostScript or PDF files. | |
| reference: | Veerle Fack and Svetlana Topalova and Joost Winne (2005), On the enumeration of uniquely reducible double designs, in 2005 European Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Applications (EuroComb '05), Stefan Felsner (ed.), Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science Proceedings AE, pp. 129-132 |
| bibtex: | For a corresponding BibTeX entry, please consider our BibTeX-file. |
| ps.gz-source: | dmAE0125.ps.gz (52 K) |
| ps-source: | dmAE0125.ps (127 K) |
| pdf-source: | dmAE0125.pdf (134 K) |
The first source gives you the `gzipped' PostScript, the second the plain PostScript and the third the format for the Adobe accrobat reader. Depending on the installation of your web browser, at least one of these should (after some amount of time) pop up a window for you that shows the full article. If this is not the case, you should contact your system administrator to install your browser correctly.
Due to limitations of your local software, the two formats may show up differently on your screen. If eg you use xpdf to visualize pdf, some of the graphics in the file may not come across. On the other hand, pdf has a capacity of giving links to sections, bibliography and external references that will not appear with PostScript.
Automatically produced on Di Sep 27 10:09:48 CEST 2005 by gustedt
