Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
Volume 6 n° 1 (2003), pp. 13-40
| author: | Cedric Chauve |
|---|---|
| title: | A bijection between planar constellations and some colored Lagrangian trees |
| keywords: | Planar maps, trees, enumeration, bijection, Lagrange formula |
| abstract: | Constellations are colored planar maps that generalize different families of maps (planar maps, bipartite planar maps, bi-Eulerian planar maps, planar cacti, ...) and are strongly related to factorizations of permutations. They were recently studied by Bousquet-Melou and Schaeffer who describe a correspondence between these maps and a family of trees, called Eulerian trees. In this paper, we derive from their result a relationship between planar constellations and another family of trees, called stellar trees. This correspondence generalizes a well known result for planar cacti, and shows that planar constellations are colored Lagrangian objects (that is objects that can be enumerated by the Good-Lagrange formula). We then deduce from this result a new formula for the number of planar constellations having a given face distribution, different from the formula one can derive from the results of Bousquet-Melou and Schaeffer, along with systems of functional equations for the generating functions of bipartite and bi-Eulerian planar maps enumerated according to the partition of faces and vertices. If your browser does not display the abstract correctly (because of the different mathematical symbols) you can look it up in the PostScript or PDF files. |
| reference: | Cedric Chauve (2003), Constellations are Lagrangian objects: a bijective proof, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 6, pp. 13-40 |
| bibtex: | For a corresponding BibTeX entry, please consider our BibTeX-file. |
| ps.gz-source: | dm060102.ps.gz (92 K) |
| ps-source: | dm060102.ps (398 K) |
| pdf-source: | dm060102.pdf (260 K) |
The first source gives you the `gzipped' PostScript, the second the plain PostScript and the third the format for the Adobe accrobat reader. Depending on the installation of your web browser, at least one of these should (after some amount of time) pop up a window for you that shows the full article. If this is not the case, you should contact your system administrator to install your browser correctly.
Due to limitations of your local software, the two formats may show up differently on your screen. If eg you use xpdf to visualize pdf, some of the graphics in the file may not come across. On the other hand, pdf has a capacity of giving links to sections, bibliography and external references that will not appear with PostScript.
Automatically produced on Tue Feb 11 22:52:38 CET 2003 by falk